Pharmacology Research & Perspectives

BackgroundLong-acting injectable buprenorphine (LAIB) has been positioned as a potentially transformative option for opioid use disorder (OUD), in part because patient experiences reported in qualitative studies emphasize reduced daily burden, increased "freedom," reduced stigma, and fewer pressures related to diversion--while also noting barriers such as insufficient information, early adverse experiences, and concerns about coercion. MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional online survey of adults recruited from the Behavioral Health Research Panel (BHRP). Eligibility included age [≥]18, English literacy, and OUD diagnosis or problematic opioid use within the past 5 years. Survey content assessed buprenorphine experience, knowledge and attitudes toward LAIB, attribute preferences, and open-text feedback. Descriptive statistics were generated; analyses were stratified by buprenorphine experience (experienced vs naive). ResultsAmong 105 participants, 82.9% reported prior buprenorphine use, and 17.1% were buprenorphine-naive. Overall, 53.3% preferred a long-acting injection regimen (weekly/monthly/3-monthly) versus 46.7% preferring a daily oral tablet/film. Convenience and adherence-related themes (e.g., not missing doses, fewer visits) drove LAIB preference, while oral-route preference and concerns about side effects and safety were prominent among those favoring oral formulations. ConclusionsIn this national convenience sample, preferences were nearly evenly split between daily oral and long-acting injectable buprenorphine regimens, with a slight overall preference for LAIB. Findings align with the qualitative literature, emphasizing the practical and psychosocial benefits of LAIB, alongside persistent needs for improved education, shared decision-making, and attention to tolerability, safety perceptions, and cost/coverage barriers.

BackgroundLong-acting injectable buprenorphine (LAI-BUP) is safe and effective, however is dramatically underutilized in comparison to oral formulations. Little is known regarding how buprenorphine prescribers view LAI-BUP, and which medication attributes they prioritize when selecting treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD). MethodsA secondary analysis of a national, cross-sectional online survey of U.S. physicians who prescribe buprenorphine for OUD was conducted. Respondents reported OUD caseload, LAI-BUP use, and the importance of medication attributes relevant to treatment selection (e.g., efficacy, safety, ease of administration, ease of prescribing, and administrative requirements). Providers were categorized as no LAI-BUP use or, among LAI-BUP prescribers, Low vs High use based on a median split. Group comparisons used chi-square (or Fishers exact) tests for categorical variables and Jonckheere-Terpstra tests for ordinal responses. ResultsAmong 125 respondents, 39 (31.2%) reported no patients receiving LAI-BUP. The remaining 86 (68.8%) were LAI-BUP prescribers, split evenly into Low and High (ns=43; 34.4%) groups using a median cut of 23.2%. LAI-BUP use did not differ meaningfully by specialty, region, or practice setting. Greater LAI-BUP use was reported by providers with larger OUD panels. Ratings of key medication attributes were uniformly high. ConclusionsLAI-BUP remains underused, with uptake highest among clinicians managing larger OUD caseloads. Measured attitudes toward medication attributes did not explain these differences. Future work should assess clinic workflow, staffing, reimbursement, and REMS burden, testing targeted implementation strategies using mixed-methods trials. Identifying what shifts clinicians from no use to low and high use may guide scalable implementation interventions.

BackgroundCompounded versions of tirzepatide are widely available in the U.S. in the form of fixed-dose combinations of tirzepatide and various analogs of vitamin B12. These combinations are mass marketed in the U.S. and other countries as comparable to FDA-approved tirzepatide products even though they undergo no evaluation of their potency or impurity profiles. Research Design and MethodsSamples of compounded tirzepatide combined with B12 obtained from various sources in the U.S. market were tested using various analytical methods. Samples were assessed for unacceptable levels of peptide-related impurities. ResultsOur testing identified a widespread and previously unidentified impurity in compounded tirzepatide-B12 products resulting from a chemical reaction between tirzepatide and certain analogs of B12. ConclusionDespite the presence of this impurity, these products continue to be mass marketed as "personalized" treatments. Our findings underscore the importance of testing and FDA approval before new drugs are marketed and highlights potential risks for patients associated with untested combinations. A novel impurity, present at substantial levels in compounded tirzepatide/B12 products, highlights risks inherent in marketing complex therapies outside the drug-approval framework. Although clinical effects of this impurity are unknown, the identification of a widespread impurity adds to the existing quality concerns presented by compounded tirzepatide.

Xylazine is a 2-adrenergic agonist typically used in as a sedative and analgesic in veterinary medicine. For some years, xylazine has been reported as an additive to fentanyl on the illicit drug market and has been associated with severe side-effects including severe ulcerations and potential amputations at the sites of injection along with an increased risk of respiratory depression and death. We recently reported that xylazine has modest {kappa} opioid agonist activity in vitro and in vivo and asked if other 2-adrenergic agonists had similar off-target activities. To test this hypothesis, we profiled US FDA-approved 2-adrenergic agonists at 320 G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) to identify potentially deleterious and/or beneficial off-targets. Although all other tested 2-adrenergic agonists were devoid of {kappa} opioid agonist activity, each had a distinct pattern of activity at various GPCRs and differential patterns of signaling bias at 2-receptor subtypes. These findings suggest potential molecular targets for both side-effects and therapeutic activities among known 2-adrenergic agonists.

BackgroundThe evolving nature of patient concerns during pregnancy and delivery, including labor pain, plays a key role in guiding antenatal counseling about labor and delivery, but the timing of these concerns has not been well characterized. Understanding when labor pain becomes a prominent concern for pregnant patients can inform the timing of antenatal education about labor analgesia. ObjectiveThis study aimed to determine how labor pain ranks among pregnancy-related concerns identified by nulliparous pregnant patients and how the relative prominence of these concerns changes across gestation. MethodWe conducted a prospective, single-center longitudinal cohort study of 53 English-speaking, nulliparous patients. Participants ranked their top seven concerns from a list of 13 pregnancy-related concerns, including labor pain, at 20, 24-, 28-, 32-, and 36-weeks gestation. Rankings were scored from 1 (lowest-ranked concern) to 7 (highest-ranked concern), with the six unranked concerns assigned a score of zero. Changes in labor pain concern scores over time were assessed using linear mixed-effects models, adjusting for maternal characteristics and pregnancy- and fetal-related complications. ResultsThe score for concern about labor pain management increased with advancing gestational age, with mean adjusted rank scores increasing from 1.4 at 20 weeks to 3.8 at 36 weeks (P < 0.001). No demographic or clinical covariates were significantly associated with labor pain score. Peak scores were most commonly reported at 28- and 36-weeks gestation. DiscussionWhile labor pain became a greater salient concern along pregnancy, for some nulliparous patients, concern about labor pain arose as early as 20th week gestation, with significant individual variation in the timing of these concerns.

BackgroundSpinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery commonly causes maternal hypotension, which may compromise uteroplacental perfusion and maternal comfort. Guidelines recommend maintaining maternal blood pressure near baseline with prophylactic vasopressor strategies, yet titration remains reactive. We evaluated an autoregressive with exogenous input (ARX) decision-support algorithm that provides real-time forecasts of maternal mean arterial pressure (MAP) to support vasopressor management during cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. MethodsIn this single-center, open-label, prospective pilot study, 20 pregnant patients at term undergoing elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia received standard care supplemented by ARX-generated MAP predictions at 1-, 2- and 3-minute horizons. Clinicians titrated phenylephrine per institutional protocol while reviewing ARX predictions, retaining full autonomy for dosing decisions. Predictive performance was quantified using root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of determination (R{superscript 2}), and fraction of improvement in total error (FIT). ARX-guided patients were matched 1:2 to nonconcurrent controls (n = 40) on attending anesthesiologist and intrathecal bupivacaine dose, with nearest-neighbor matching on age and body mass index. Exploratory outcomes included hypotension (MAP <80% of baseline), phenylephrine dose, maternal nausea, and neonatal outcomes. For minute-level hypotension classification performance, sensitivity/specificity (and related metrics) were estimated using generalized estimating equations (GEE) to account for within-patient clustering of repeated observations. ResultsOne-minute-ahead ARX predictions achieved a mean ({+/-}SD) RMSE of 3.71 {+/-} 3.26 mmHg and MAE of 2.75 {+/-} 2.52 mmHg, with R{superscript 2} 0.34 {+/-} 0.63 and FIT 21.1% {+/-} 18.7%. Predictive performance decreased at longer horizons. For hypotension prediction, one-minute-ahead GEE-estimated population-average sensitivity and specificity were 57.39% and 99.74%, respectively. During the observation window, in exploratory comparisons with matched nonconcurrent controls, ARX-guided patients had a shorter duration of hypotension (0.8 {+/-} 1.9 vs 3.0 {+/-} 3.8 minutes; P = .005) and a lower incidence of hypotension (25.0% vs 52.5%; P = .033), but a higher phenylephrine dose (1823 {+/-} 659 vs 974 {+/-} 328 {micro}g; P = .001). Maternal nausea incidence was lower in the ARX group compared with matched nonconcurrent controls (5% vs 35%; P = .014), with similar neonatal outcomes. ConclusionsIn this prospective pilot study, an ARX decision-support algorithm provided accurate 1-minute-ahead MAP forecasts and was associated with higher phenylephrine dosing and shorter maternal hypotension duration compared with matched nonconcurrent controls. These findings support further evaluation in larger, randomized trials. Summary statementIn this prospective pilot study of 20 patients undergoing cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia, an autoregressive with exogenous input (ARX) decision-support algorithm provided real-time blood pressure forecasts and was associated with a shorter hypotension duration but higher phenylephrine dose compared with matched nonconcurrent controls. These preliminary data support further evaluation of ARX-guided, algorithmic vasopressor management in larger, multicenter trials. Key PointsO_LIQuestion: In pregnant patients at term undergoing elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia, can a real-time ARX algorithm accurately forecast MAP and support vasopressor management? C_LIO_LIFindings: One-minute-ahead forecasts were accurate (RMSE 3.71 mmHg), and ARX-guided care was associated with a shorter duration of hypotension and a higher phenylephrine dose versus matched nonconcurrent controls C_LIO_LIMeaning: Real-time MAP forecasting is feasible and warrants randomized evaluation to confirm clinical benefit and characterize trade-offs. C_LI

BackgroundThe strength and transparency of clinical trial evidence supporting drug approvals has become increasingly scrutinized, particularly considering the increased use of regulatory flexibility and expedited pathways. While U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) standards have been extensively analyzed, evidence standards at the European Medicines Agency (EMA) remain less well-characterized. Thus, this study aims to systematically assess the design, quality, and outcomes of pivotal efficacy trials supporting EMA drug approvals between 2020 and 2023. MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional analysis of new medicines and biosimilars receiving positive opinions from the EMAs Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) and subsequent approval by the European Commission between January 2020 and December 2023. Data were extracted from European Public Assessment Reports (EPARs) and EMA medicine databases. Key variables included trial design features, primary endpoint type and achievement status, and justification for approval in cases of failed efficacy endpoints. ResultsBetween 2020 and 2023, 232 drugs were approved by the EMA for 281 indications. Of these, 205 (88.4%) were new active substances and 65 (28.0%) were granted orphan designation. Forty-six products (19.8%) were approved via a special regulatory program, most commonly Conditional Approval (26 products; 11.2%). Cancer was the leading therapeutic area, accounting for 61 approvals (26.3%). Approvals were supported by 393 pivotal clinical trials. Of these, 327 (83.2%) were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 218 (66.6% of RCTs) had a superiority design. A total of 232/393 trials (59.0%) relied on surrogate endpoints. Overall, 22 approvals (9.5%) were supported by at least one pivotal trial in which at least one primary endpoint was not met; in seven of these cases (31.8%), the failed trial was the sole pivotal trial. The most common rationale for approval despite null primary results was reliance on the totality of evidence, secondary endpoints, or clinical judgment (9 products; 40.9%). ConclusionsOur findings reveal substantial variability in the design and evidentiary strength of pivotal trials supporting EMA approvals between 2020 and 2023. While the majority of studies were RCTs, reliance on surrogate endpoints was common. That 10% of approvals were based on pivotal trials with null primary endpoints highlights the nuanced role of regulatory judgment in therapeutic evaluation. These findings prompt reflection on evolving evidence standards in drug regulation and underscore the need for transparency and consistent justifications.

BackgroundCesarean section is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures worldwide and is frequently associated with moderate to severe postoperative pain. While overall pain after cesarean delivery is well described, evidence comparing pain intensity and analgesic use between primary and repeat cesarean sections remains limited. ObjectiveTo compare postoperative pain severity and total analgesic consumption within the first 24 hours among women undergoing primary versus repeat cesarean sections under spinal anesthesia at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, from January 1 to March 30, 2025. MethodsA prospective cohort study was conducted among 203 women who underwent cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. Participants were selected using systematic random sampling and categorized into primary and repeat cesarean groups. Demographic and clinical characteristics were summarized using descriptive statistics. Group comparisons were performed using independent t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests for continuous variables and Chi-square tests for categorical variables. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. ResultsWomen undergoing repeat cesarean sections experienced significantly higher postoperative pain. During movement, 92.1% of women in the repeat group reported moderate to severe pain compared with 66.7% in the primary group (p < 0.001). At rest, moderate to severe pain occurred in 74.3% of the repeat group versus 52.9% of the primary group (p = 0.002). Pain scores within the first 6 hours were also higher in the repeat group (median NRS 7, IQR 7-8) than in the primary group (median NRS 5, IQR 4-7; p < 0.001). Total analgesic consumption was significantly greater among women in the repeat group (243.3 {+/-} 98.4 mg) compared with the primary group (146.3 {+/-} 82.5 mg; p < 0.001). ConclusionsRepeat cesarean sections are associated with higher early postoperative pain and increased analgesic requirements. These findings support the need for individualized and intensified pain management strategies for women undergoing repeat cesarean delivery. Clinical trial numberNot applicable

BackgroundIntraoperative opioid administration for cardiac surgery varies greatly, with most of this variability arising from anesthesiologist and institutional practices. Anesthesiologists administer intraoperative opioids via intermittent boluses and continuous infusions. Real-world data have shown infusion administration to be a strong determinant of high intraoperative opioid exposure, but whether bolus or infusion administration of sufentanil affects post-operative outcomes is unknown. MethodsWe conducted a prospective, randomized, single-blind controlled trial to compare the impact of intraoperative intermittent bolus administration versus continuous infusion of sufentanil on time to extubation in adult patients undergoing nonemergent cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass at a single tertiary referral university hospital in the United States. ResultsThe primary endpoint was the time from operating room departure to extubation in the intensive care unit. The study was terminated early for futility after an interim analysis of 50 subjects. The infusion group received statistically higher doses of intraoperative opioid. The per-protocol analysis found no statistical difference in time to extubation between the bolus group (median 2.9 hours) and infusion group (median 2.6 hours). Secondary outcomes, including post-operative pain scores, opioid consumption, ICU length of stay, and hospital stay, and adverse event rates were comparable between groups. ConclusionsIntraoperative administration of sufentanil via bolus or infusion results in similar time to extubation and recovery metrics. Since continuous infusions are a strong predictor of higher total intraoperative opioid doses, protocols emphasizing administration via intermittent boluses may reduce opioid exposure without compromising recovery. Key PointsO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSDoes the method of intraoperative sufentanil administration, either by intermittent bolus or infusion, affect weaning from mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit after cardiac surgery? FindingsThe method of sufentanil administration did not affect time to extubation after cardiac surgery, but the infusion group received significantly higher intraoperative opioid doses compared to the intermittent bolus group. MeaningIntermittent opioid bolus administration may reduce intraoperative opioid dosage without negatively impacting recovery after cardiac surgery.

Background: Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a chronic multisystem disease characterized by profound fatigue, post-exertional malaise, cognitive impairment, and autonomic dysfunction. Its pathophysiology is incompletely understood and likely involves complex interactions between immune, autonomic, and metabolic dysregulation. Despite features with potential relevance for anesthesia and perioperative care, evidence to guide anesthetic management in individuals with ME/CFS remains limited. We therefore performed a retrospective matched-pair analysis to generate clinical data on perioperative responses and identify areas for future research. Methods: We conducted a retrospective matched-pair analysis at a single tertiary center. All patients with ME/CFS undergoing general anesthesia from 2015 to 2026 were identified using ICD-10 codes (G93.3 and U09.9) with additional manual verification and matched 1:1 to controls for comparison. Patients with confounding diagnoses or American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status above III were excluded. The analysis focused on intraoperative hemodynamic parameters, including baseline, post-induction, median, and lowest recorded systolic blood pressure and heart rate, as well as early postoperative outcomes in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), including maximum pain scores and requirement for rescue analgesia. Results: Out of 189 individuals identified through ICD-10 codes, 15 matched pairs were included after application of exclusion criteria. ME/CFS patients exhibited lower lowest recorded intraoperative systolic blood pressure (90 [82.5-95.0] mmHg in ME/CFS vs 100 [90.0-110.0] mmHg in controls, p = 0.044) as well as lower lowest heart rate (50 [40.0-57.5] bpm in ME/CFS vs 60 [50.0-65.0] bpm in controls, p = 0.012). Vasopressor use and fluid administration did not differ, and no episodes of severe hypotension or perioperative adverse events were observed. Postoperative pain was higher in ME/CFS, with higher maximum pain scores (NRS 5.0 [4.0-6.0] in ME/CFS vs 1.0 [0.0-4.0] in controls, p = 0.008) and more frequent opioid rescue analgesia (80% in ME/CFS vs 33% in controls, p = 0.039). Postoperative nausea or vomiting, oxygen supplementation, and PACU length of stay were similar between groups. Conclusions: General anesthesia appears hemodynamically well tolerated in individuals with ME/CFS. In contrast, postoperative pain burden is increased and may require tailored analgesic strategies. Post-exertional malaise, a key disease feature with potentially delayed onset and significant impact, was not captured in this study and remains an important target for future research. These hypothesis-generating findings highlight the need for prospective studies to optimize perioperative management and evaluate patient-relevant outcomes in ME/CFS.

Neuroactive steroids modulate GABAA and NMDA receptors allosterically, typically requiring specific structural features for their activity. In this study, we characterize YX84, a novel neuroactive steroid bearing a 3{beta} sulfate and p-trifluoroacetylbenzyl alcohol attached in an ether linkage to a hydroxyl group at steroid carbon 17. This compound and similar analogues exhibit an atypical pharmacological profile, with three distinct actions at GABAA receptors. First, YX84 is a full agonist, with EC50 near 1 {micro}M and comparable efficacy to GABA at GABAA receptors in native hippocampal neurons. It presents as a full agonist relative to GABA at 4/{delta} subunit-containing receptors. Second, YX84 acts as a slow-onset, potent positive allosteric modulator (PAM) of GABAA receptors at concentrations below those that gate a response. Finally, YX84 exhibits rapid desensitizing and/or blocking kinetics; voltage dependence is consistent with a contribution of channel block. Structure- activity relationship analyses reveal that both functional groups are essential for gating activity, while classical requirements such as carbon 3 hydroxyl stereoselectivity and carbon 5 reduction are dispensable. YX84 also modestly inhibits NMDA receptor currents, suggesting weak negative allosteric modulation. Behavioral assays show that intraperitoneal administration of YX84 (30 mg/kg) does not impair sensorimotor function, unlike allopregnanolone. These findings identify YX84 as a structurally distinct neuroactive steroid with dual receptor activity and favorable behavioral tolerability, offering a promising scaffold for therapeutic development targeting excitatory/inhibitory imbalance in neuropsychiatric disorders if pharmacokinetic considerations can be overcome.

BACKGROUNDThis study evaluates the reach, scalability, and implementation of a large-scale, multi-site tele-buprenorphine program designed to treat opioid use disorder (OUD) within rural carceral settings. Given that individuals transition frequently between jails and the community, these facilities represent a critical window for OUD intervention, yet they often face significant provider shortages and logistical barriers. We conducted a retrospective chart review of 842 unique patients (1,321 treatment episodes) enrolled in the University of Marylands tele-buprenorphine program across six rural county jails between June 2020 and May 2025. Data extracted from jail records and electronic health records were used to analyze patient demographics, prescribing patterns, and program retention. RESULTSThe patient population was primarily male (71.1%) and White (75.7%), with a mean age of 35.4 years. Participants reported high-severity OUD, with an average of 12.6 years of opioid use. Reflecting broad admission criteria, 55.2% of participants were new treatment initiates not receiving MOUD prior to booking. Patients spent a mean of 35.6 days incarcerated before initiation and were retained in the program for an average of 66 days. Buprenorphine doses were titrated from a mean initiation dose of 8.8 mg to 16.2 mg at discharge. The program demonstrated a 99.5% adherence rate among retained patients. Only 3% of the total sample were discharged for medication diversion or hoarding. CONCLUSIONSTelemedicine is a highly feasible and scalable model for delivering evidence-based MOUD in rural jails. By utilizing a "liberal admission policy" that prioritizes both treatment initiation and maintenance, programs can successfully reach high-risk individuals who lack access to community-based care. These findings suggest that tele-buprenorphine can effectively bridge the treatment gap in underserved jurisdictions, potentially reducing the risk of overdose during the high-risk post-release period.

Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is caused by epigenetic dysregulation of the disease locus, leading to pathogenic misexpression of DUX4 in skeletal muscle. Thus, most FSHD therapeutic approaches target DUX4. Our previous study identified the chromatin remodeling factor BAZ1A (bromodomain adjacent to zinc finger domain protein 1A) as a promising target for therapeutic development. Here we used an artificial intelligence-based screening pipeline to identify molecules predicted to bind the BAZ1A bromodomain, and validated hit compounds using FSHD-specific assays in FSHD myocytes. One compound, termed C06, emerged as a potent and specific repressor of DUX4 and DUX4 target gene expression. Interestingly, while C06 exhibited binding to BAZ1A in vitro, it can also inhibit multiple kinases, including p38, an upstream activator of DUX4. Despite this, at low doses C06 was an equally effective and more specific repressor of DUX4 than losmapimod, which is a robust and specific p38 inhibitor. Thus, C06 is a useful tool for potent and specific DUX4 suppression, and a viable candidate for further development. Our results highlight both the utility and limitations of AI for targeted drug discovery, and the importance of using an FSHD-specific functional screening strategy for selecting relevant candidates.

BackgroundAntibiotic pricing is a key determinant of access and stewardship in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), yet empirical evidence on how prices are formed within pharmaceutical markets remains limited. However, there is little longitudinal evidence on how antibiotic prices behave within national pharmaceutical supply systems. This study evaluated the patterns and determinants of systemic antibiotic pricing in Tanzania using national regulatory import permit data. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of antibiotic importation records from the Tanzania Medicines and Medical Devices Authority for 2010-2016. Systemic antibiotics for human use imported via oral or parenteral routes were included. Unit prices (USD per smallest unit of measure) were summarized using the median and interquartile range (IQR). Prices were compared by route of administration, supplier country, and product naming practice (INN-named versus brand-named) using Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests with false discovery rate adjustment. ResultsOf the 14,301 records, 10,894 (76.2%) met the inclusion criteria. Oral antibiotics predominated (89.6%). Although the median oral antibiotic prices declined over time, substantial price dispersion persisted across all study years. Parenteral antibiotics were consistently more expensive (USD 0.755-3.370) and more variable than oral antibiotics. Importation was concentrated in a few medicines, with amoxicillin-clavulanate (16.7%) and amoxicillin (11.4%) accounting for over one-quarter of records, and in a few supplier countries, with India representing 44.9% of the records. Significant price differences between INN-named and branded products were observed for amoxicillin (adjusted p<0.001) and ciprofloxacin (adjusted p=0.018), whereas prices differed significantly by supplier country across major medicines (adjusted p<0.05). Across medicines and years, wide within-product price distributions indicate persistent market segmentation rather than price convergence. ConclusionsAntibiotic import prices in Tanzania exhibit systematic and reproducible variations associated with formulation type, supplier origin, and product naming practices. The findings indicate that procurement structure and supplier participation strongly influence pricing in the import-dependent pharmaceutical market. Monitoring import-level prices can serve as an upstream indicator of market conditions and support evidence-informed procurement, pricing regulations, and antimicrobial stewardship policies in LMIC settings.

Chronic pain affects a significant portion of the global population and imposes substantial clinical and socioeconomic burdens. Current treatments mainly rely on opioid analgesics, which carry serious risks of dependence and misuse, underscoring the urgent need for alternative therapeutic strategies. Galanin receptors (GALR1-3) are known to be involved in modulating pain, yet their specific roles remain poorly understood due to the lack of receptor subtype-selective ligands. Recently, spexin has been identified as an endogenous peptide that selectively activates GALR2 and GALR3, offering a new scaffold for developing pharmacological tools targeting these receptor subtypes. In this study, we report the design and characterization of a modified spexin analog, LIT-01-144, engineered through N-terminal functionalization with a fluorocarbon chain to improve metabolic stability while preserving receptor selectivity. In vitro assays showed that LIT-01-144 has high potency at GALR2 and GALR3, with minimal activity at GALR1. Pharmacokinetic studies revealed a significantly longer plasma half-life compared to native spexin and no central nervous system penetration. In mice, intracerebroventricular administration of LIT-01-144 produced strong antinociceptive effects at doses ten times lower than spexin. While systemic administration showed no notable antinociception in naive animals, LIT-01-144 significantly reduced pain responses in a mouse model of persistent inflammatory pain induced by complete Freunds adjuvant (CFA). This antinociceptive activity was specifically mediated through GALR2 and was independent of opioid receptor pathways. In situ hybridization further showed an increase in Galr2-positive neurons in dorsal root ganglia of inflamed mice. Overall, these findings highlight GALR2 as a promising peripheral target for developing non-opioid analgesics and demonstrate the potential of LIT-01-144 as a valuable tool for understanding GALR2-mediated mechanisms of pain modulation.

Background: Cysteamine is the only disease-modifying therapy for nephropathic cystinosis and has shown promise in mitochondrial disorders, but its clinical utility is limited by poor tolerability due to high peak concentrations with existing formulations. TTI-0102 is a novel natural controlled-release cysteamine prodrug designed to provide sustained cysteamine exposure with improved tolerability. Methods: A multi-center, randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 2 trial enrolled 9 patients with MELAS syndrome caused by mtDNA m.3243A>G mutation (>50% heteroplasmy) and moderate disease severity (NMDAS score 15-45). Patients received placebo (n=3) or TTI-0102 at 2.75 g/day for one week then 5.5 g/day (n=6, equivalent to 2.5 g/day cysteamine base). Pharmacokinetic parameters, safety, and pharmacodynamic biomarkers including pyruvate, taurine, pantothenic acid, tryptophan, GSH/GSSG, lactate, GDF-15, and FGF-21 were assessed. Clinical efficacy was evaluated using the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) and 12-minute walk test. Results: TTI-0102 demonstrated expected gastrointestinal side effects (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea) consistent with the cysteamine class, with dropout occurring in patients 50 kg receiving fixed 5.5 g/day dosing. Weight-based dosing at 60 {+/-} 5 mg/kg TTI-0102 (~26 mg/kg cysteamine base equivalent) achieved sustained 24-hour cysteamine exposure with half the daily dose and peak concentrations lower than expected by dose proportionality, compared to approved formulations (Procysbi: 56 mg/kg, peak 2.5 mg/L vs. TTI-0102: 26 mg/kg, peak ~2 mg/L). TTI-0102 significantly elevated pantothenic acid (plateauing at 2 weeks) and taurine levels, providing mitochondrial cofactor support and antioxidant effects. Statistically significant pharmacodynamic effects included increased plasma pyruvate (p=0.03) without lactate elevation, suggesting enhanced glycolytic flux, and decreased tryptophan (p<0.01), potentially reducing oxidative stress from neurotoxic kynurenine pathway metabolites. Interestingly, increase in plasma pyruvate and decrease in tryptophan were negligible at doses up to 40 mg/kg/day, optimal at 60 mg/kg/day, and slightly less at 65 mg/kg/day. GSH/GSSG measurements were confounded by sample stability issues. GDF-15, FGF-21, and 12-minute walk distance showed no treatment-related changes. Most notably, MFIS total scores demonstrated significant improvement in TTI-0102-treated patients at 60 mg/kg/day average dose compared to placebo (p=0.04). Polynomial regression revealed therapeutic onset at ~4 weeks, maximal benefit at ~12 weeks, and subsequent plateau. Conclusions: This Phase 2 trial provides proof-of-concept that TTI-0102 is safe and well-tolerated in MELAS patients while treated with less than 65 mg/kg/day, with efficacy signals in fatigue reduction, a cardinal symptom affecting 71-100% of mitochondrial disease patients. The drug tri-faceted mechanism through sustained cysteamine, taurine, and pantothenic acid delivery addresses oxidative stress, mitochondrial energy metabolism, and cofactor deficiency. Significant MFIS improvement coupled with favorable modulation of pyruvate and tryptophan supports advancing TTI-0102 to larger Phase 2b/3 trials in mitochondrial disease employing weight-based dosing (60 {+/-} 5 mg/kg), validated patient-reported outcomes, and minimum 12-week treatment duration. The same mechanism of cysteamine/cystine thiol-disulfide exchange in lysosomes that may benefit mitochondrial diseases also supports cystinosis treatment. An investigator-initiated study in cystinosis will evaluate whether once-daily TTI-0102 at 60 {+/-} 5 mg/kg can maintain therapeutic WBC cystine levels, potentially offering improved adherence and quality of life compared to current twice-daily or four-times-daily regimens, and this weight-adjusted dosing strategy and pharmacodynamic biomarkers identified in the MELAS study are going to be used to inform the design of the planned Phase 2 study in Leigh syndrome, another mitochondrial disorder, in collaboration with the Childrens Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP), with particular attention to dose optimization and biomarker-based assessment of pharmacological activity. Acknowledgement: We are very thankful to the patients and the clinical teams of Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre (Netherlands) and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers (France) for their participation in this operationally challenging study.

Background/ObjectivesThe quality and characteristics of approved medicines can vary substantially depending on manufacturing processes and standards within a given country. The aim of the study was to compare the available marketed brands of ademetionine tablets derived from various countries in order to identify potential differences between the different formulations. MethodsWe performed comprehensive analyses of the physical, chemical, and dissolution characteristics of different formulations of ademetionine tablets marketed in China, India, Russia, Ukraine, and Uzbekistan, using the originator formulation of Heptral(R) as the reference standard. The formulations were evaluated at initial analysis and after 3 months at 40{degrees}C/75% relative humidity. Clinical parameters such as ademetionine content, degradation products, S,S-isomer, and water content were assessed using HPLC, and a dissolution profile analysis performed in 2 hours of acid solution followed by 90 minutes in a buffer solution. ResultsThe Nusam (India) and Ximeixin (China) products were the two products most comparable to the Heptral products. Adenomak (Ukraine), the only food-grade product and only one with the tosylate salt showed the most significant quality variations compared to Heptral including dissolution failure as well as considerable variability between batches. ConclusionsThe study highlights the importance of using pharmaceutical-grade ademetionine products to maintain clinical efficacy and ensuring standards are maintained across global markets.

BackgroundAnthracyclines such as doxorubicin are effective chemotherapeutics but are limited by cardiotoxicity driven in part by mitochondrial dysfunction. Dysregulated mitochondrial dynamics, particularly excessive dynamin-related protein-1 (Drp1)-mediated fission, contribute to doxorubicin-induced cardiac injury and support selective survival of cancer cells. ObjectivesTo determine whether DRP1i2, a novel small molecule Drp1 inhibitor targeting a conserved domain shared between human and mouse, can function as a cardio-oncology therapeutic by reducing doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity while maintaining or enhancing anti-cancer efficacy. MethodsCardioprotective effects of DRP1i2 were evaluated in a murine model of chronic doxorubicin cardiotoxicity and in human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiac microtissues exposed to acute doxorubicin injury. Anticancer activity was assessed across multiple cancer cell lines using 2D monolayers and 3D microtissues. ResultsIn vivo, DRP1i2 preserved left ventricular ejection fraction, reduced interstitial fibrosis and cardiomyocyte atrophy, and attenuated doxorubicin-induced myocardial proteomic remodelling. In human cardiac microtissues, DRP1i2 improved viability and restored contractile function despite persistent mitochondrial oxidative stress. DRP1i2 showed modest anticancer activity in MG63 osteosarcoma cells in both 2D and 3D systems and did not diminish doxorubicin efficacy in other cancer models (MDA-MB-231 breast, OVCAR3 ovarian, and A549 lung adenocarcinoma). Combined treatment further enhanced cytotoxicity selectively in MG63 cells. ConclusionsDRP1i2 exerts complementary cardioprotective and anticancer actions through modulation of shared mitochondrial pathways, identifying Drp1 as a druggable target in cardio-oncology. These findings support DRP1i2 as a first-in-class Drp1 inhibitor and highlight mitochondrial dynamics as a promising therapeutic axis to preserve anthracycline efficacy while reducing cardiotoxicity. Clinical PerspectivesExcessive Drp1-mediated mitochondrial fission links anthracycline cardiotoxicity with cancer cell survival. Inhibition with DRP1i2 preserved cardiac structure and function in a chronic doxorubicin cardiotoxicity model without compromising anti-cancer activity, representing mechanism-based cardioprotection, where the heart is protected by directly targeting the molecular processes driving injury. Translation will require pharmacologic profiling and testing in tumour-bearing and comorbid models, followed by early-phase trials to confirm safety and efficacy.

BackgroundBuprenorphine use in the intensive care unit (ICU) remains not well studied despite growing perioperative guidance supporting its continuation and initiation for patients with opioid use disorder (OUD). Trauma ICU admissions represent a critical opportunity to address untreated OUD, as well as continuation of an already established treatment plan for OUD, yet barriers limit its adoption in this setting. MethodsThis single-center quality improvement study evaluated for inpatient buprenorphine prescribing patterns following provider education at a tertiary academic trauma center. Adult trauma ICU patients with OUD admitted between 2016-2024 were identified through the institutional trauma registry. Patients with pre-admission buprenorphine were excluded, yielding a cohort of 95 patients: 24 buprenorphine-exposed (initiated in the hospital) and 71 controls. Primary outcomes included pain scores and opioid requirements (morphine milligram equivalents, MME) during the first 48 hours. Secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition, and 90-day readmission. ResultsBaseline characteristics were similar between groups. No statistically significant differences were observed in first recorded pain scores (median 8 vs. 10; p=0.35), mean 48-hour pain scores (7.40 vs. 7.76; p=0.44), or total opioid consumption (232 vs. 119 mg MME; p=0.45). Median hospital LOS (16 vs. 19 days; p=0.48) and 90-day readmission rates (42.3% vs. 33.3%; p=0.40) were also comparable. ConclusionInpatient buprenorphine initiation in trauma ICU patients with OUD was not associated with worse pain control, increased opioid requirements, or adverse clinical outcomes. These findings support the integration of buprenorphine into critical care pathways as a safe strategy to address OUD during hospitalization and improve long-term recovery continuity.

Background Plasma gelsolin (pGSN) is a non-immunosuppressive anti-inflammatory immunomodulator with demonstrated efficacy in animal models of acute lung injury. Its potential role in moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is currently under investigation. Methods We conducted a phase 1, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of recombinant human pGSN (rhu-pGSN) following intravenous (IV) administration to healthy volunteers. Thirty-two participants were assigned to 4 sequentially ascending dose cohorts (6, 12, 18, 24 mg/kg of body weight) to receive five IV infusions of rhu-pGSN or saline placebo. Each cohort includes 8 subjects randomized 3:1 with rhu-pGSN or placebo. Doses were administered at 0 hours, 12 hours, 36 hours, 60 hours, and 84 hours. The primary outcome is the incidence and severity of clinical and laboratory AEs regardless of causality. Secondary outcomes include the pharmacokinetics of IV rhu-pGSN and the presence of anti-rhu-pGSN antibodies at Day 28. Results Overall, 10 subjects (41.7%) who received rhu-pGSN reported a total of 13 adverse events (AEs), and 1 subject (12.5%) who received placebo reported an AE. All AEs were mild or moderate. AEs in system organ classes that were reported by 2 or more subjects in either arm were skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (12.5% rhu-pGSN; 0% placebo), gastrointestinal disorders (8.3% rhu-pGSN; 0% placebo), and nervous system disorders (12.5% rhu-pGSN; 12.5% placebo). No AEs by preferred term were reported by more than 1 subject in either arm. Three subjects (12.5%) experienced an AE assessed as related to study drug. No serious AEs occurred, and no AEs led to study discontinuation, dose interruption/reduction, or death. There were no apparent between-treatment differences in laboratory abnormalities, vital signs, or electrocardiogram findings. Conclusions Overall, in this study, IV rhu-pGSN (up to 24 mg/kg daily) appeared safe and well tolerated compared to placebo. The median half-life of rhu-pGSN exceeded 14 h across all dosing regimens, supporting once daily IV dosing in healthy subjects. Trial registration This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov on 2023-03-29 under the registration identifier NCT05789745.