Pharmacology Research & Perspectives

Abstract Background: Acute postoperative pain affects more than 80% of surgical patients, with orthopedic lower limb procedures consistently associated with severe pain intensity and high opioid requirements. Preemptive analgesia with oral agents has been proposed to attenuate central and peripheral sensitization prior to surgical incision. Tapentadol, a dual-mechanism -opioid receptor agonist and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, and pregabalin, a voltage-gated calcium channel modulator, represent pharmacologically distinct premedication options; however, direct comparative data in this surgical context are lacking. This pilot randomized controlled trial aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy and safety of 72-hour oral premedication with tapentadol versus pregabalin in patients undergoing elective lower limb surgery under neuraxial anesthesia. Methods: In this double-blind, parallel-group pilot trial, 46 patients scheduled for elective lower limb surgery under neuraxial anesthesia were randomized equally to receive tapentadol 50mg orally every 12 hours (Group A, n = 23) or pregabalin 75mg orally every 24 hours (Group B, n = 23), initiated 72 hours before surgical incision. The primary outcome was postoperative pain intensity assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0-10) at post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) arrival (T0) and at 30 (T1), 60 (T2), 90 (T3), and 120 (T4) minutes thereafter. Secondary outcomes included Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) scores, rescue morphine consumption, and safety. The primary longitudinal analysis used a linear mixed model (LMM) with Group, Time, and Group x Time interaction as fixed effects and a random intercept per patient; between-group contrasts at each timepoint were derived from estimated marginal means with Holm correction. Effect sizes are reported as Cohen's d. Results: All 46 patients completed the study with no missing data. Both groups were pain-free at T0 (NRS=0). Pain scores diverged progressively from T1 onward, with the pregabalin group reporting consistently higher NRS values at every time point. The LMM revealed a significant main effect of Time (F4,181.6 = 23.61, p < 0.001) and a borderline-significant Group x Time interaction in the continuous-time sensitivity model (F1,187.6 = 3.79, p = 0.053). Post-hoc contrasts identified a statistically significant, large effect between-group difference at T3 (mean NRS difference -0.91, p = 0.006, Cohen's d = -0.96) and a medium-effect trend at T2 (d = -0.59, p = 0.089). Rescue analgesia was required by 4.3% of tapentadol patients versus 21.7% of pregabalin patients. Nausea and vomiting were equally present in both groups (17.4%). No hypersensitivity reactions were observed in either arm. Conclusions: Seventy-two-hour oral premedication with tapentadol 100mg/day provided superior postoperative analgesia compared with pregabalin 75 mg/day at the 90-minute PACU time point, with a large effect size and a fivefold reduction in rescue analgesia requirements. Both agents were well tolerated. These pilot data support the conduct of a fully powered, multicenter randomized controlled trial to confirm the analgesic superiority of tapentadol premedication in orthopedic lower limb surgery.

Background: Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) affects up to 11.2% of patients after neuraxial anesthesia. The sphenopalatine ganglion block (SPGB) is a promising minimally invasive intervention, but high-quality randomized trial data are limited. We conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial to assess feasibility and inform a future definitive trial. Methods: Twenty-six patients with PDPH following accidental dural puncture with 17G Tuohy needles were randomized to conservative management (bed rest, hydration) or SPGB (bilateral intranasal 2% lidocaine). Primary outcomes were feasibility (recruitment, retention, protocol adherence). Secondary outcomes included pain intensity (Numeric Rating Scale, NRS 0-10) at 30 minutes, 12 hours, and 24 hours; rescue analgesia requirements; mobilization time; and adverse events. Results: Feasibility was confirmed: 100% recruitment of target sample, 100% retention, 100% protocol adherence. At 30 minutes, all SPGB patients reported complete pain resolution (NRS=0) versus median NRS 3 (IQR 2) in controls (p<0.001), though this finding is limited by lack of blinding and baseline assessment. No SPGB patients required rescue analgesia or experienced adverse events. Conservative group patients had prolonged hospitalization (46%). Sample size calculation for a definitive trial (90% power, =0.05) yields 120 participants (60/group). Conclusions: A definitive RCT comparing SPGB to conservative management for PDPH is feasible. Preliminary efficacy data suggest rapid analgesia with SPGB, but rigorous confirmation in a sham-controlled trial is required. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov -NCT07494383 (retrospectively registered). Keywords: Post-dural puncture headache, sphenopalatine ganglion block, pilot study, feasibility, regional anesthesia, randomized controlled trial

Background: Orthopedic surgeries are associated with significant intraoperative and postoperative pain, necessitating effective anesthesia strategies. Spinal anesthesia is commonly used for lower limb procedures due to its rapid onset and reliability; however, its limited duration may compromise prolonged surgical procedures and early postoperative pain control. Adjuvants such as dexamethasone have been explored to enhance and prolong the effects of local anesthetics. While evidence supports its efficacy, data from low-resource settings remain limited. Objective: To assess the effect of intrathecal dexamethasone as an adjuvant to bupivacaine on sensory block duration, time to first postoperative analgesia, and postoperative pain in patients undergoing lower limb orthopedic surgery at KCMC. Methodology: A randomized, double-blind controlled trial was conducted among 96 adult patients undergoing elective lower limb orthopedic surgery under spinal anesthesia. Participants were allocated using a computer-generated randomization sequence to receive either bupivacaine 15 mg with dexamethasone 4 mg (intervention group) or bupivacaine 15 mg with 1 ml normal saline (control group). Outcomes included sensory and motor block duration, time to first postoperative analgesia, and postoperative pain scores. Results: The dexamethasone group demonstrated a significantly prolonged sensory block duration (231 +/- 6 vs. 156 +/- 9 minutes; mean difference 75.11 minutes, 95% CI: 71.92-78.29; p < 0.001) and delayed time to first postoperative analgesia (252 +/- 7 vs. 181 +/- 7 minutes; mean difference 71.89 minutes, 95% CI: 68.91-74.86; p < 0.001). Motor block duration was also significantly longer (184 +/- 7 vs. 130 +/- 5 minutes; mean difference 53.42 minutes, 95% CI: 50.99-55.85; p < 0.001). Postoperative pain scores were significantly lower at 1 hour (mean difference -1.29 points, 95% CI: -1.52 to -1.05; p < 0.001) and at 2 hours (mean difference -1.97 points, 95% CI: -2.21 to -1.73; p < 0.001). Intraoperative opioid and benzodiazepine use were significantly reduced in the intervention group. Conclusion: The addition of intrathecal dexamethasone to bupivacaine significantly enhances sensory block duration, delays postoperative analgesia need, and improves early pain control. These findings support its use as a potentially practical adjuvant in resource-limited settings.

BackgroundNon-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and weak opioids such as tramadol are cornerstones of multimodal analgesia, particu-larly in settings with limited access to potent opioids. However, cross-class equianalgesic data comparing these agents remain scarce. This pilot ran-domised controlled trial aimed to explore the analgesic equivalence of ke-torolac, diclofenac, and tramadol administered as premedication in patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery. MethodsIn this double-blind, parallel-group pilot trial, 30 patients scheduled for elective minimally invasive surgery (28 laparoscopic cholecys-tectomies, 2 laparoscopic abdominal wall repairs) under balanced general anaesthesia were randomised to receive intravenous tramadol 150 mg, ke-torolac 60 mg, or diclofenac 150 mg 45 minutes before skin incision. The primary outcome was pain intensity measured using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS, 0-10) at recovery room arrival (T0) and at 30 (T1), 60 (T2), and 90 (T3) minutes thereafter. Secondary outcomes included Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) scores, rescue morphine consumption, and safety. Between-group comparisons were performed using Kruskal-Wallis tests with Dunn post-hoc corrections; within-group trajectories were analysed using Fried-man tests. Effect sizes were estimated with epsilon-squared and Kendalls W. ResultsAll 30 patients completed the study. At T0 and T1, NRS scores were higher in the ketorolac group (median 1.5 and 3, respectively) compared with tramadol and diclofenac (both median 0 at T0; T1: tramadol 1, diclofenac 2; p < 0.05 for both). However, by T2 and T3, all three groups converged to a median NRS of 2 (p > 0.05 for between-group differences). Rescue analgesia requirements at T1 were 0/10 (tramadol), 3/10 (ketorolac), and 2/10 (diclofenac), with no statistically significant differences (p = 0.19). No hypersensitivity reactions occurred. Within-group analyses showed con-sistent pain trajectories, with Kendalls W ranging from 0.31 (ketorolac) to 0.64 (tramadol). ConclusionsIn this pilot study, equianalgesic doses of tramadol, ke-torolac, and diclofenac provided comparable postoperative pain control over 90 minutes following minimally invasive surgery. All agents were well toler-ated. These findings support the feasibility of a larger definitive trial and offer clinically useful guidance for analgesic selection in resource-limited settings. Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov - NCT07500454 (retrospectively registered). HighlightsO_LIDouble-blind pilot RCT compared equianalgesic doses of tramadol, ke-torolac, and diclofenac. C_LIO_LIAll three groups converged to median NRS 2 by 60 minutes postoper-atively. C_LIO_LIEarly higher pain in the ketorolac group was partly attributed to age imbalance ({rho}=0.49, p=0.006). C_LIO_LINo hypersensitivity reactions occurred in any group. C_LIO_LIDefinitive trial requires 27 patients per group (90 total with 10% attri-tion). C_LI

BackgroundCompounded versions of tirzepatide are widely available in the U.S. in the form of fixed-dose combinations of tirzepatide and various analogs of vitamin B12. These combinations are mass marketed in the U.S. and other countries as comparable to FDA-approved tirzepatide products even though they undergo no evaluation of their potency or impurity profiles. Research Design and MethodsSamples of compounded tirzepatide combined with B12 obtained from various sources in the U.S. market were tested using various analytical methods. Samples were assessed for unacceptable levels of peptide-related impurities. ResultsOur testing identified a widespread and previously unidentified impurity in compounded tirzepatide-B12 products resulting from a chemical reaction between tirzepatide and certain analogs of B12. ConclusionDespite the presence of this impurity, these products continue to be mass marketed as "personalized" treatments. Our findings underscore the importance of testing and FDA approval before new drugs are marketed and highlights potential risks for patients associated with untested combinations. A novel impurity, present at substantial levels in compounded tirzepatide/B12 products, highlights risks inherent in marketing complex therapies outside the drug-approval framework. Although clinical effects of this impurity are unknown, the identification of a widespread impurity adds to the existing quality concerns presented by compounded tirzepatide.

Xylazine is a 2-adrenergic agonist typically used in as a sedative and analgesic in veterinary medicine. For some years, xylazine has been reported as an additive to fentanyl on the illicit drug market and has been associated with severe side-effects including severe ulcerations and potential amputations at the sites of injection along with an increased risk of respiratory depression and death. We recently reported that xylazine has modest {kappa} opioid agonist activity in vitro and in vivo and asked if other 2-adrenergic agonists had similar off-target activities. To test this hypothesis, we profiled US FDA-approved 2-adrenergic agonists at 320 G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) to identify potentially deleterious and/or beneficial off-targets. Although all other tested 2-adrenergic agonists were devoid of {kappa} opioid agonist activity, each had a distinct pattern of activity at various GPCRs and differential patterns of signaling bias at 2-receptor subtypes. These findings suggest potential molecular targets for both side-effects and therapeutic activities among known 2-adrenergic agonists.

BackgroundNeuropathic pain is a major source of disability and distress with few pharmacological options for treatment. Opioid drugs can be effective, but high doses are needed, leading to unwanted effects. BMS-986122 is a positive allosteric modulator of the mu opioid receptor that potentiates acute opioid antinociception without increasing opioid-induced constipation, reward, or respiratory depression. Therefore, we asked if BMS-986122 could increase the effects of low-dose opioid analgesics in chronic neuropathic pain. MethodsWe employed the spared nerve injury and tibial neuroma models in rats and assessed the tactile hypersensitivity of the hind paw and site of neuroma, respectively. ResultsAdministration of low doses of (R)-methadone, morphine, or buprenorphine slightly reduced the tactile hypersensitivity of the hind paw the in spared nerve injury model. Pretreatment with BMS-986122 significantly enhanced the reversal of hypersensitivity, reaching the effect of high-dose gabapentin, a standard of care in neuropathic pain. Pretreatment with BMS-986122 similarly increased the anti-allodynic effects of low dose (R)-methadone on neuroma pain. A similar effect of (R)-methadone in the absence of BMS-986122 was only observed at a dose where respiratory distress was seen. ConclusionsThese findings show that allosteric modulators of the mu opioid receptor such as BMS-986122 can enhance opioid activity that could translate to a safe and effective treatment for chronic neuropathic pain.

ABSTRACT Background: Self medication with analgesics and non steroidal anti inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is common in low- and middle income countries and may expose users to preventable adverse outcomes. Evidence from Guinea remains scarce. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of self medication with analgesics and NSAIDs among pharmacy clients in urban Conakry, identify associated factors, and describe clinical risk situations. Methods: We conducted a pharmacy based analytical cross sectional study in 30 private pharmacies across Conakry, Guinea. A total of 1,032 participants seeking analgesics or NSAIDs were enrolled between November 3, 2012, and April 5, 2013. Self-medication was defined as acquisition or use without a valid medical prescription. Factors associated with self-medication were analysed using multivariable logistic regression. Results: Among 1,032 participants, 603 reported self medication (prevalence 58.4%). Previous unsupervised use was reported by 78.7%. The most frequently used medicines were paracetamol (56.9%, n=587), diclofenac (21.3%, n=220), ibuprofen (17.9%, n=185), and aspirin (3.9%, n=40). Overall, 68.0% (n=702) reported no knowledge of potential adverse effects. Clinical risk situations were frequent: gastrointestinal disorders (41.3%, n=426), hypertension (9.2%, n=95), and pregnancy exposure among reproductive age women (26.0%). In multivariable analysis, self medication was independently associated with previous analgesic/NSAID use (aOR = 2.8, 95% CI: 2.1 to 3.6), lack of knowledge of adverse effects (aOR = 1.9, 95% CI: 1.4 to 2.5), informal occupation (aOR = 1.6, 95% CI: 1.2 to 2.2), and age 18 to 59 years (aOR = 1.5, 95% CI: 1.1 to 2.1). Conclusions: In this pharmacy based study conducted in urban Conakry, self medication with analgesics and NSAIDs was common and frequently associated with limited awareness of potential adverse effects. These findings support the need for strengthened pharmaceutical regulation, pharmacist-led counselling, health literacy interventions, and improved access to primary care. Keywords: self medication; analgesics; NSAIDs; paracetamol; diclofenac; ibuprofen; pharmacy; Guinea; Conakry; drug safety; public health.

Background and Aims: Synthetic opioids cause tens of thousands of deaths each year in North America, and there are indications that synthetic opioids are also becoming increasingly prevalent in the European drug market. This study aimed to examine high-risk substance use in the German drug-using community with a particular focus on the synthetic opioids fentanyl and nitazenes and related awareness, concerns, overdose experiences, and harm-reduction behavior. Design: Cross-sectional, observational online survey. Setting: Open drug-use scenes, addiction clinics, and substitution practices at numerous geographic locations throughout Germany, August to September 2025. Participants: 235 individuals aged 14+ from the drug using community (mean age 43.4 years; 57.9% male), 79.6% recruited by peers in open drug-use scenes. Measurements: The primary outcome was substances used within the past 12 months. In addition, sources, forms, routes of administration, and perceived changes in availability and price of (synthetic) opioids were assessed as well as risk perceptions, fears, harm-reduction behavior, and overdose-related experiences. Findings: 227 respondents reported substance use with an average of 6.2 substances, and 73.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 67.0-78.5%) had used at least one opioid in the past year. Synthetic opioids were consumed in many parts of Germany and across all age and gender groups. Among participants who experienced a shortage of their primary opioid in the past year, 25% (95% CI = 15.8-37.2%) reported having used fentanyl instead. 56.5% (95% CI = 36.8-74.3%) of individuals using synthetic opioids reported having experienced an overdose in the past twelve months. Most of the respondents perceived synthetic opioids as posing a high risk, and a substantial proportion expressed fear that they could be mixed into their own substances. However, only 9.9% (95% CI = 6.6-14.7%) use drug checking, although the vast majority stated they would use it if it were available to them. Conclusions: Synthetic opioids, including fentanyl and nitazenes, have entered the German drug scene, with users reporting high rates of overdose and limited access to harm reduction measures. Germany may be in an early phase of a synthetic opioid transition, warranting urgent expansion of surveillance, naloxone distribution, and drug checking services.

BackgroundCesarean section is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures worldwide and is frequently associated with moderate to severe postoperative pain. While overall pain after cesarean delivery is well described, evidence comparing pain intensity and analgesic use between primary and repeat cesarean sections remains limited. ObjectiveTo compare postoperative pain severity and total analgesic consumption within the first 24 hours among women undergoing primary versus repeat cesarean sections under spinal anesthesia at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, from January 1 to March 30, 2025. MethodsA prospective cohort study was conducted among 203 women who underwent cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. Participants were selected using systematic random sampling and categorized into primary and repeat cesarean groups. Demographic and clinical characteristics were summarized using descriptive statistics. Group comparisons were performed using independent t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests for continuous variables and Chi-square tests for categorical variables. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. ResultsWomen undergoing repeat cesarean sections experienced significantly higher postoperative pain. During movement, 92.1% of women in the repeat group reported moderate to severe pain compared with 66.7% in the primary group (p < 0.001). At rest, moderate to severe pain occurred in 74.3% of the repeat group versus 52.9% of the primary group (p = 0.002). Pain scores within the first 6 hours were also higher in the repeat group (median NRS 7, IQR 7-8) than in the primary group (median NRS 5, IQR 4-7; p < 0.001). Total analgesic consumption was significantly greater among women in the repeat group (243.3 {+/-} 98.4 mg) compared with the primary group (146.3 {+/-} 82.5 mg; p < 0.001). ConclusionsRepeat cesarean sections are associated with higher early postoperative pain and increased analgesic requirements. These findings support the need for individualized and intensified pain management strategies for women undergoing repeat cesarean delivery. Clinical trial numberNot applicable

BackgroundThe discontinuation of Fasiglifam (TAK-875), a GPR40/FFAR1 full agonist, during Phase 3 clinical trials due to hepatotoxicity led to widespread abandonment of GPR40 as a viable therapeutic target for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, mechanistic evidence suggests that Fasiglifams hepatotoxicity arises from mitochondrial liability driven by high lipophilicity (aLogP = 5.31), rather than from on-target GPR40 signaling. We hypothesized that target-level failure was incorrectly inferred from compound-level safety concerns, and that superior candidates exist within publicly available databases. MethodsWe queried ChEMBL Release 36 (28 GB SQLite, 74 tables) for all compounds with documented GPR40/FFAR1 activity (UniProt: O14842). Compounds were filtered by EC50 [&le;] 10 nM in nM units with standard relation "=". Drug-likeness was assessed using Lipinskis Rule of Five (Ro5), aLogP, molecular weight (MW), hydrogen bond donors/acceptors (HBD/HBA), and polar surface area (PSA). A parallel analysis of Therapeutic Target Database (TTD v10.1.01, 4,298 targets) provided clinical context. A real-world evidence (RWE) patient stratification framework was constructed using EMR data from tens of millions of patients with >10 years of longitudinal follow-up. ResultsOf 2,637 GPR40-active compounds in ChEMBL 36, 526 (19.9%) demonstrated EC50 < 100 nM and 102 (3.9%) demonstrated EC50 < 10 nM. Eight compounds met stringent drug-likeness criteria (Ro5 violations = 0, aLogP < 5.0, EC50 [&le;] 1 nM). The lead compound (CHEMBL4859651) exhibited EC50 = 0.04 nM (8.75-fold more potent than Fasiglifam), MW = 297 Da (43% lower), and aLogP = 4.30 (19% lower), with zero Ro5 violations. Mean MW of the eight candidates was 317 {+/-} 28 Da versus 524 Da for Fasiglifam. A parallel GCK analysis identified a protein-protein interaction target (CHEMBL3885579, GCK-GKRP interface) harboring 40 exclusive compounds as an orthogonal strategy for partial GCK activation. ConclusionsSystematic cheminformatic analysis reveals that compounds with substantially superior activity and drug-likeness profiles relative to Fasiglifam exist within ChEMBL 36. Fasiglifams hepatotoxicity is attributable to compound-specific physicochemical properties, not GPR40-mediated toxicity. RWE patient stratification may further mitigate hepatotoxicity risk for next-generation GPR40 agonists. These findings argue for systematic reappraisal of GPR40 as a viable therapeutic target for T2DM.

Background: The impact of the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) upon late-stage developments has been assumed to be limited. The Congressional Budget Office's IRA analysis excluded post-approval innovation, potentially overlooking substantial economic risks to drug developers and declines in the availability of treatments in areas of high unmet medical need such as oncology. Methods: A total of 1148 secondary trials from 364 FDA-approved medicines, published from 2018 to 2025, were obtained from Biomedtracker and clinicaltrials.gov. Using fractional multinomial logit, we model the share distribution of secondary indication studies across 19 disease groups and assess the change in this distribution post-IRA. We also assessed the number of secondary treatment studies pre- vs. post-IRA using multiple linear regression. Results: After the IRA's introduction, small molecule follow-on studies in oncology exhibited a statistically significant 35% decline (R2 = .48, p < 0.014) and lead indication small molecule oncology approvals exhibited a statistically significant 27% decline (R2 = .70, p < 0.002). We also find a statistically significant 14% decline in the share of orphan oncology studies pre- vs. post-IRA (p<0.001). Research Conclusions: This study's results refute claims that the IRA would have minimal negative effects on patient access or late-stage biopharmaceutical R&D. We hope this study reinvigorates debate about the law's unintended consequences and encourages thoughtful policy solutions, as the IRA manifestly creates disincentives that negatively impact patients seeking needed new medicines, particularly those requiring cures addressing metastatic late-stage cancers.

Background: Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a chronic multisystem disease characterized by profound fatigue, post-exertional malaise, cognitive impairment, and autonomic dysfunction. Its pathophysiology is incompletely understood and likely involves complex interactions between immune, autonomic, and metabolic dysregulation. Despite features with potential relevance for anesthesia and perioperative care, evidence to guide anesthetic management in individuals with ME/CFS remains limited. We therefore performed a retrospective matched-pair analysis to generate clinical data on perioperative responses and identify areas for future research. Methods: We conducted a retrospective matched-pair analysis at a single tertiary center. All patients with ME/CFS undergoing general anesthesia from 2015 to 2026 were identified using ICD-10 codes (G93.3 and U09.9) with additional manual verification and matched 1:1 to controls for comparison. Patients with confounding diagnoses or American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status above III were excluded. The analysis focused on intraoperative hemodynamic parameters, including baseline, post-induction, median, and lowest recorded systolic blood pressure and heart rate, as well as early postoperative outcomes in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), including maximum pain scores and requirement for rescue analgesia. Results: Out of 189 individuals identified through ICD-10 codes, 15 matched pairs were included after application of exclusion criteria. ME/CFS patients exhibited lower lowest recorded intraoperative systolic blood pressure (90 [82.5-95.0] mmHg in ME/CFS vs 100 [90.0-110.0] mmHg in controls, p = 0.044) as well as lower lowest heart rate (50 [40.0-57.5] bpm in ME/CFS vs 60 [50.0-65.0] bpm in controls, p = 0.012). Vasopressor use and fluid administration did not differ, and no episodes of severe hypotension or perioperative adverse events were observed. Postoperative pain was higher in ME/CFS, with higher maximum pain scores (NRS 5.0 [4.0-6.0] in ME/CFS vs 1.0 [0.0-4.0] in controls, p = 0.008) and more frequent opioid rescue analgesia (80% in ME/CFS vs 33% in controls, p = 0.039). Postoperative nausea or vomiting, oxygen supplementation, and PACU length of stay were similar between groups. Conclusions: General anesthesia appears hemodynamically well tolerated in individuals with ME/CFS. In contrast, postoperative pain burden is increased and may require tailored analgesic strategies. Post-exertional malaise, a key disease feature with potentially delayed onset and significant impact, was not captured in this study and remains an important target for future research. These hypothesis-generating findings highlight the need for prospective studies to optimize perioperative management and evaluate patient-relevant outcomes in ME/CFS.

Neuroactive steroids modulate GABAA and NMDA receptors allosterically, typically requiring specific structural features for their activity. In this study, we characterize YX84, a novel neuroactive steroid bearing a 3{beta} sulfate and p-trifluoroacetylbenzyl alcohol attached in an ether linkage to a hydroxyl group at steroid carbon 17. This compound and similar analogues exhibit an atypical pharmacological profile, with three distinct actions at GABAA receptors. First, YX84 is a full agonist, with EC50 near 1 {micro}M and comparable efficacy to GABA at GABAA receptors in native hippocampal neurons. It presents as a full agonist relative to GABA at 4/{delta} subunit-containing receptors. Second, YX84 acts as a slow-onset, potent positive allosteric modulator (PAM) of GABAA receptors at concentrations below those that gate a response. Finally, YX84 exhibits rapid desensitizing and/or blocking kinetics; voltage dependence is consistent with a contribution of channel block. Structure- activity relationship analyses reveal that both functional groups are essential for gating activity, while classical requirements such as carbon 3 hydroxyl stereoselectivity and carbon 5 reduction are dispensable. YX84 also modestly inhibits NMDA receptor currents, suggesting weak negative allosteric modulation. Behavioral assays show that intraperitoneal administration of YX84 (30 mg/kg) does not impair sensorimotor function, unlike allopregnanolone. These findings identify YX84 as a structurally distinct neuroactive steroid with dual receptor activity and favorable behavioral tolerability, offering a promising scaffold for therapeutic development targeting excitatory/inhibitory imbalance in neuropsychiatric disorders if pharmacokinetic considerations can be overcome.

Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is caused by epigenetic dysregulation of the disease locus, leading to pathogenic misexpression of DUX4 in skeletal muscle. Thus, most FSHD therapeutic approaches target DUX4. Our previous study identified the chromatin remodeling factor BAZ1A (bromodomain adjacent to zinc finger domain protein 1A) as a promising target for therapeutic development. Here we used an artificial intelligence-based screening pipeline to identify molecules predicted to bind the BAZ1A bromodomain, and validated hit compounds using FSHD-specific assays in FSHD myocytes. One compound, termed C06, emerged as a potent and specific repressor of DUX4 and DUX4 target gene expression. Interestingly, while C06 exhibited binding to BAZ1A in vitro, it can also inhibit multiple kinases, including p38, an upstream activator of DUX4. Despite this, at low doses C06 was an equally effective and more specific repressor of DUX4 than losmapimod, which is a robust and specific p38 inhibitor. Thus, C06 is a useful tool for potent and specific DUX4 suppression, and a viable candidate for further development. Our results highlight both the utility and limitations of AI for targeted drug discovery, and the importance of using an FSHD-specific functional screening strategy for selecting relevant candidates.

ObjectivesTo determine whether adding S-ketamine or dexmedetomidine to oxycodone affects the microbiological, physical, or chemical stability of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) solutions prepared in a hospital pharmacy. MethodsOxycodone solution (1 mg/mL) and three oxycodone-S-ketamine mixtures (0.25, 0.50, 0.75 mg/mL) and three oxycodone-dexmedetomidine mixtures (2.5, 5.0, 10 {micro}g/mL) were compounded under validated EU GMP Class A/B aseptic conditions and filled into PCA reservoirs. Reservoirs (n=42 for physicochemical studies; n=21 for sterility; n=4 for antimicrobial activity testing) were stored at 2-8{degrees}C for 28 days, then at 20-25{degrees}C for 2 days. Sterility was assessed by membrane filtration according to Ph. Eur. 2.6.1. Physical stability was evaluated by visual inspection, pH, weight, and osmolality. Chemical stability was assessed using a validated HPLC-UV method developed in accordance with FDA and ICH Q2(R1) guidelines. ResultsAll antimicrobial activity tests showed growth of the six reference strains, indicating no inhibition by the drug mixtures. All 21 sterility-test reservoirs remained free of turbidity throughout 30 days. No visual changes, precipitation, or discolouration were observed. Weight loss was [&le;]0.3%, pH changes were between required range 4,5-7, and osmolality increased by <1.4% during the study. Measured oxycodone, S-ketamine, and dexmedetomidine concentrations remained within {+/-}5% of initial values, and no degradation products were detected. ConclusionsOxycodone PCA solutions containing S-ketamine or dexmedetomidine remained sterile, physically stable, and chemically stable for 28 days at 2-8{degrees}C followed by 2 days at room temperature at 20-25{degrees}C. These findings support extended shelf-life and centralized batch preparation of opioid-adjuvant PCA reservoirs in hospital pharmacy practice. Key MessagesO_ST_ABSWhat is already known on this topicC_ST_ABSOpioid-adjuvant combinations such as oxycodone with S-ketamine or dexmedetomidine are increasingly used in patient-controlled analgesia, but no commercial multi-agent formulations exist. Hospital pharmacies therefore prepare these mixtures as compounded sterile preparations, despite limited data on their chemical and microbiological stability. What this study addsThis study demonstrates that oxycodone PCA solutions containing S-ketamine or dexmedetomidine remain chemically stable and microbiologically sterile for 28 days at 2-8{degrees}C plus 2 days at 20-25{degrees}C, when prepared under validated aseptic conditions. Concentrations of all analytes remained within {+/-}5% of initial values, and no degradation products were detected using a validated HPLC-UV method. How this study might affect research, practice or policyThese stability data support the assignment of extended beyond-use dates and enable centralized batch compounding of PCA reservoirs in hospital pharmacies. The findings have the potential to reduce aseptic workload, improve production efficiency and decrease medication waste while ensuring product quality.

BackgroundAntibiotic pricing is a key determinant of access and stewardship in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), yet empirical evidence on how prices are formed within pharmaceutical markets remains limited. However, there is little longitudinal evidence on how antibiotic prices behave within national pharmaceutical supply systems. This study evaluated the patterns and determinants of systemic antibiotic pricing in Tanzania using national regulatory import permit data. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of antibiotic importation records from the Tanzania Medicines and Medical Devices Authority for 2010-2016. Systemic antibiotics for human use imported via oral or parenteral routes were included. Unit prices (USD per smallest unit of measure) were summarized using the median and interquartile range (IQR). Prices were compared by route of administration, supplier country, and product naming practice (INN-named versus brand-named) using Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests with false discovery rate adjustment. ResultsOf the 14,301 records, 10,894 (76.2%) met the inclusion criteria. Oral antibiotics predominated (89.6%). Although the median oral antibiotic prices declined over time, substantial price dispersion persisted across all study years. Parenteral antibiotics were consistently more expensive (USD 0.755-3.370) and more variable than oral antibiotics. Importation was concentrated in a few medicines, with amoxicillin-clavulanate (16.7%) and amoxicillin (11.4%) accounting for over one-quarter of records, and in a few supplier countries, with India representing 44.9% of the records. Significant price differences between INN-named and branded products were observed for amoxicillin (adjusted p<0.001) and ciprofloxacin (adjusted p=0.018), whereas prices differed significantly by supplier country across major medicines (adjusted p<0.05). Across medicines and years, wide within-product price distributions indicate persistent market segmentation rather than price convergence. ConclusionsAntibiotic import prices in Tanzania exhibit systematic and reproducible variations associated with formulation type, supplier origin, and product naming practices. The findings indicate that procurement structure and supplier participation strongly influence pricing in the import-dependent pharmaceutical market. Monitoring import-level prices can serve as an upstream indicator of market conditions and support evidence-informed procurement, pricing regulations, and antimicrobial stewardship policies in LMIC settings.

PurposeOpioid overdose deaths disproportionately affect racial and ethnic minority populations in the United States, yet claims-based evidence characterizing the multi-dimensional structure of these disparities across incidence, treatment access, costs, and insurance coverage remains limited. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cross-sectional and longitudinal cohort analysis using the HealthVerity Launch Sample, a large administrative claims database. The study population comprised 3,675,823 patients across 5 racial groups enrolled between 2020 and 2024. Eight primary analyses were conducted, including age-sex standardized overdose rates, temporal disparity trends, medication-assisted treatment (MAT) receipt, naloxone access, pharmacy costs, insurance payer type, care setting, and multivariable logistic regression for overdose risk. ResultsBlack patients had the highest age-sex standardized overdose rate (363.4 per 100,000; rate ratio [RR] = 1.27 vs. White), and those with opioid use disorder (OUD) received MAT at a rate 35% lower than White patients (19.8% vs. 30.7%; RR = 0.645), driven primarily by a buprenorphine access deficit. AIAN patients demonstrated consistent multi-dimensional disadvantage across naloxone access, MAT engagement, and pharmacy costs. After adjustment for payer type, age, and sex, all non-White groups showed lower adjusted odds of overdose than White patients (Black OR = 0.87; AIAN OR = 0.25), with Medicaid enrollment carrying 7.06 times the overdose odds of commercial insurance. ConclusionInsurance type is the dominant predictor of overdose risk, and the disproportionate Medicaid enrollment of Black patients is both a consequence of structural disadvantage and access disparities. Targeted interventions such as buprenorphine expansion in Medicaid and enhanced naloxone distribution are recommended.

BackgroundThe X-linked muscle wasting disorder Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a progressive and ultimately fatal disease caused by loss of function mutations in the dystrophin (DMD) gene. Upregulation of utrophin (UTRN), an embryonic homologue of dystrophin, has been proposed as a therapeutic option that could ameliorate disease. We previously generated a bioluminescent screen for utrophin-upregulating compounds using a mouse reporter of endogenous utrophin expression and discovered that inhibition of ERK1/2 and EZH2, increases utrophin expression in myoblasts. MethodologyHere we extend this analysis to show that treatment of human myoblasts with the ERK1/2 inhibitor LY3214996 and the EZH2 inhibitor GSK503, increases UTRN expression in primary and immortalised myoblasts derived from healthy volunteers and DMD patients. ResultsShort-term (24 hours) inhibition of ERK1/2 and EZH2 resulted in increased expression of utrophin in proliferating myoblasts. Surprisingly, in patient-derived samples, but not healthy controls, increased UTRN expression was sustained following drug removal and in vitro differentiation. Furthermore, dystrophin deficient myoblasts have altered expression of myogenic transcription factors MYOD1 and MYOG and proliferation marker Ki67, signalling an altered regenerative capacity of these cells, while ERK1/2 inhibition, alone or combined with EZH2i, reversed this transcriptional signature. ConclusionsTreatment with ERK1/2 and EZH2 inhibitors could offer a therapeutic option for DMD by increasing UTRN and MYOD1 expression. We propose that this may compensate for DMD loss and help restore productive muscle differentiation and regeneration.

ObjectivesTo evaluate supply-chain vulnerabilities affecting medications essential for treating sexually transmitted infection in the United States and identify disruption mechanisms that may predispose these therapies to shortages. MethodsWe conducted a qualitative, structured supply-chain vulnerability assessment of first-line medications for five priority sexually transmitted pathogens recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organization: azithromycin, doxycycline, ceftriaxone, benzathine penicillin G, metronidazole, tinidazole, acyclovir, and cefixime. Using a predefined framework derived from pharmaceutical supply-chain disruption literature, we evaluated 13 disruption categories spanning raw material sourcing, active pharmaceutical ingredient production, manufacturing, distribution, market dynamics, information systems, and post-distribution loss mechanisms. Each category was assessed using four binary indicators and classified as relevant when at least two criteria were satisfied. ResultsMultiple disruption domains applied across the drug set. Recurrent vulnerabilities included geographically concentrated active pharmaceutical ingredient production, limited manufacturing redundancy in low-margin generic markets, manufacturing constraints affecting sterile injectable products, reliance on consolidated distribution networks, and susceptibility to demand surges and information-system disruptions. All eight drugs exhibited at least one regulatory or market signal consistent with potential supply vulnerability, including documented shortages, product discontinuations, or limited manufacturer participation. ConclusionsSupply-chain vulnerabilities were identified across multiple first-line sexually transmitted infection therapies, indicating that disruption risk is not confined to a single drug. There is a need for policy interventions to strengthen supply-chain resilience, including diversification of active pharmaceutical ingredient sourcing and distribution networks, as well as incentives for sustainable generic production.